Judges note that not only has work been assigned but considerable work has been done according to respondents, though that factor alone would not suffice as we had made clear vide our interims orders that the respondent No.3 would have to meet the..

Judges note that not only has work been assigned but considerable work has been done according to respondents, though that factor alone would not suffice as we had made clear vide our interims orders that the respondent No.3 would have to meet the benchmark of the eligibility norms and any work done was at its risk and cost. 21. We are, thus, of the view that the tendering process in question does not call for any interference in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as there is no arbitrariness, illegality or perversity involved in the same. On the other hand, the concerned authorities have duly verified the experience of respondent No.3 and, undisputedly, the financial terms are the best as offered by respondent No.3. 22. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

Judges found that Senior Town Planner, Faridabad Circle is already seized of the matter and has in fact issued a letter dated 22.7.2013 to the District Town Planner for necessary action. Thus, the concerned authorities are in seisin of the dispute..

Judges found that Senior Town Planner, Faridabad Circle is already seized of the matter and has in fact issued a letter dated 22.7.2013 to the District Town Planner for necessary action. Thus, the concerned authorities are in seisin of the dispute. Mr. Ajay Gupta, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in Court, assures that he will get the matter personally verified to ensure that whatever action has been initiated by the Senior Town Planner is taken to its logical conclusion.  We dismiss the petition with the aforesaid observations.  In view of our observations, a copy of the petition has been supplied to learned Additional Advocate General in Court. 

This writ petition has been filed for the enforcement of the fundamental rights of working women under Arts. 14, 19 and 21 of the  Show

This writ petition has been filed for the enforcement of the fundamental rights of working women under Arts. 14, 19 and 21 of the  Constitution of India in view of the prevailing climate in which the violation of these rights is not uncommon. With the increasing awareness and emphasis on gender justice, there is increase in the effort to guard against such violations: and the resentment towards incidents of sexual harassment is also increasing. The present petition has been brought as a class action by certain social activists and NGOs with the aim of focusing attention towards this societal aberration, and assisting in finding suitable methods for realization of the true concept of ‘gender equality’; and to prevent sexual harassment of working women in all work places through judicial process, to fill the vacuum in existing legislation. 

Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013

(I) The Committee will be notified by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India forthwith.

(II) The Committee will have its office in the national capital and requisite infrastructure including manpower will be pro..

(I) The Committee will be notified by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India forthwith.

(II) The Committee will have its office in the national capital and requisite infrastructure including manpower will be provided by the Central Government.

(III) The remuneration and perquisites of the Chairman of the Committee and its members will be fixed by the Union Government in consultation with the individual concerned and in accordance with prevailing norms.

(IV) All State Governments as well as different Ministries/Departments/Wings of the Central Government who are currently looking after the multi-dimensional issues pertaining to road safety will submit their first report to the Committee within three months from today indicating the state of implementation and enforcement of all laws pertaining to (i) licensing; (ii) certification of fitness of vehicles; (iii) limits of use of vehicles i.e. passenger carrying capacity, weight carrying capacity etc.; (iv) use of road safety devices; (v) adherence to norms including user of roads, and (vi) deployment of adequate manpower for enforcement of the existing provisions of law.

(V) The Union Government as well as the State Government shall also indicate their views on the necessity of further change in the law, if any.

(VI) The Union Government as well as the Government of the States shall also offer their views on the suggestions/recommendations of the different bodies/persons noticed and mentioned in the present order which are presently not under implementation.

(VII) The Committee shall undertake a detailed scrutiny and examination of the Report(s) that may be submitted and the views of the Central and State Governments with regard to necessity of further legislation or changes in the existing laws.

(VIII) The Committee will submit its report to this Court within three months after receipt of report from the Union and the State Governments indicating and expressing its views on each of the matters referred to in the present order including the deficiencies and the defaults on the part of any of the stakeholders, as may be found.

35. The matter be posted for further consideration before this Court on the expiry of six months from today along with the report (s) as may be submitted pursuant to the present order.

36. A copy of this order be furnished to the Petitioner and each of the Respondents as well as to the Chief Secretaries of all the States/Union Territories.